Commentary: Deceptions to the rule on ultimate issue testimony.

نویسنده

  • Ralph Slovenko
چکیده

Federal Rule of Evidence 704(b) (and state counterparts) bars opinion testimony on the effect of mental state on an element of a crime or defense. The application of the rule involves substantial judicial discretion. As the jurisprudence to date indicates, deceptions to the rule circumvent its application.

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Psychiatric evidence on the ultimate issue.

Federal Rule of Evidence 704(b) prevents psychiatrists and other expert witnesses in federal criminal trials from testifying as to whether a defendant did or did not have a mental state or condition comprising either an element of the crime or an element of the defense. This paper describes the origins of the Rule and its judicial development. The Rule is an exception to a 20th century trend th...

متن کامل

A Study on the Commentary of Historical Verses with an Emphasis on the Rule of Al-Ibrah

One of the prevalent commentary rules about commentary of the historical verses which has a certain revelation occasion and refers to a specific time and place is the rule of alibrah being stated as: take in consideration universality of the word not particularity of the occasion. The source of this rule refers to the verses which have universal word and particular occasion. The referent of the...

متن کامل

Adjudicating pathological criminal incapacity within a climate of ultimate issue barriers: a comparative perspective.

Mental health experts are increasingly being utilised by the criminal justice system to provide assistance to courts during the assessment of issues falling beyond the knowledge and/or experience of the courts. A particular domain where the assistance of qualified psychiatrists and psychologists is becoming essential is where the defence of pathological criminal incapacity falls to be assessed....

متن کامل

On Being an Expert Witness: It’s not about you

Expert testimony, for many mental health professionals, is fraught with anxiety. In this article, the authors attempt to alleviate this anxiety with a simple recipe for professional, ethical, and economic success as an expert witness. Because experts are essentially getting paid for their credibility, this is one area of practice where the most ethical behavior can also be viewed as the most li...

متن کامل

Assessing Information Heard on the Radio

Much work in AI is devoted to the problem of how computers can acquire beliefs about the world through perception, but little effort is devoted to the problem of how computers can acquire beliefs through testimony. This paper is part of a continuing project whose ultimate goal is that of constructing an implementable model of how agents acquire knowledge through testimony. In particular, it loo...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

عنوان ژورنال:
  • The journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law

دوره 34 1  شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2006